Start with the AI risk you're most worried about.

Find shadow AI

Employees adopt AI tools with a work email and connect them to mailboxes and drives. No one has a list.

How FlashTower helps

The assessment records each AI tool your team reports, approved or not, and flags unapproved tools that hold sensitive data, missing OAuth consent controls, and consumer accounts used at team scale. Optional integrations add connected apps and grants from supported providers.

Example rules

• FT-IDN-001No controls on unapproved (shadow) AI tools
• FT-GOV-010Unapproved AI tool handles sensitive data
• FT-AUT-010Team-wide use of consumer AI accounts

Govern AI agents

Agents that send, delete, deploy, or pay are being connected with broad permissions and no approval step.

How FlashTower helps

FlashTower evaluates each agent's capabilities against its autonomy, credentials, and logging — surfacing excessive agency, prompt-injection exposure, and missing kill switches.

Example rules

• FT-AGT-001Unrestricted autonomous agent with high-impact permissions
• FT-EXE-001AI can execute code against production or cloud infrastructure without approval
• FT-3PI-001Prompt-injection exposure: web access combined with sensitive data or actions

Protect regulated data

PHI, privileged material, card data, and customer records end up in AI tools without the contracts or controls they require.

How FlashTower helps

Data-access rules check each AI system for BAAs, DPAs, no-training commitments, retention settings, logging, and consumer-plan use.

Example rules

• FT-DAT-010AI system accesses health information without a BAA
• FT-DAT-011Highly sensitive data in a consumer AI account
• FT-DAT-015Payment card data reachable by AI system

Review AI vendors

AI vendors differ widely in retention, training use, sub-processors, and contractual terms — and most were never reviewed.

How FlashTower helps

The vendor register records DPA and BAA status, training and retention terms, and security review dates; rules flag sensitive-data systems without them.

Example rules

• FT-VEN-001AI vendors are not reviewed before handling regulated data
• FT-DAT-013Sensitive data processed without a data processing agreement
• FT-VEN-010Vendor security review not completed for sensitive-data AI system

Report AI risk to the board

Boards, insurers, and clients are asking about AI risk. Answers today are anecdotes.

How FlashTower helps

Reports give an explainable score with its calculation, prioritized findings, a 30-day plan, and methodology — suitable for directors, auditors, and counsel.

Example rules

• FT-GOV-001No inventory of AI tools and agents
• FT-GOV-003No named owner accountable for AI risk
• FT-IRP-001Incident response does not cover AI

Roll out AI policy

Without a written policy, every employee decides alone what is safe to share with AI.

How FlashTower helps

The AI Policy Center provides editable templates — acceptable use, agent access, data handling, vendor review, human oversight, and incident response — with draft, reviewed, and approved states.

Example rules

• FT-POL-001No AI acceptable-use policy
• FT-POL-002AI use policy is still in draft
• FT-GOV-004No AI security awareness training